Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57B4D10DC5 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99527 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2014 15:30:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99450 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2014 15:30:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99440 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2014 15:30:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:30:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.171] (HELO mail-we0-f171.google.com) (74.125.82.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:30:31 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u56so2519920wes.30 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 07:30:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iyZJATp983QAawbI5VmeDzpmAPbnYla9PL09K/xVNtE=; b=bImXeCCXM57m+BCClfHvvrKzK3YoCa0UvjOd9ZT7MMD2XzD2/p0avOptY0GfK+Wh0R J989xhsKSMbKytulJ7aCXXjDNlNCH+SXB6qnX1kDniNdS8+LyY8WJDRlMo+39DPIPHA5 fksDwLCmz93tgMThAIJ4WKjtxJUVygsJGJwGR7hXu3oG3o33mjr2oH57A6vTFasH0ink 0OggsPMk1X2ltrvH6KMnKehNdzB14eXx/NUeqaSZnl0s12zateiA8xLOBV1M6p3BRI0c doxgNVsosQyhPj32w4tC/H4nKw/C5nGr/ql3XX1w+fSKq//gHm79Xhwv3++4LUwLz0BA U1Gw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.160.144 with SMTP id xk16mr118509491wib.12.1420039810348; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 07:30:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.131.129 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 07:30:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8328F394-A5B6-4EDB-9C31-66C45C488992@sharp.fm> <1E19829D-839B-447D-9B7C-9F345FEDDD96@sharp.fm> <201412211518.17254@news.perlig.de> <63C36A16-5771-4898-9292-20BA62F5EA90@sharp.fm> <13BD5A62-2F01-401B-8AD8-1EFA5E9A3AC6@sharp.fm> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:30:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch] Simplifying mod_alias From: Eric Covener To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >> I still don't see any reason to call the existing *Match deprecated to >> add expression support. > > I see no link between the two. I would like to deprecate the *Match directives, but that has no bearing on expression support. I thought the entire point of the thread was that expression support in the base directives obsoleted the *Match versions. If you didn't have the expression support, how would you describe the deprecation of RedirectMatch to a user? Should they use mod_rewrite?