httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Systemd support in 2.4
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:08:04 GMT
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Jan Kalu┼ża <jkaluza@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/14/2014 01:21 PM, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is there any special reason why mod_systemd and mod_journald (available
>>> in trunk) are not backported to 2.4 yet?
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think mod_systemd could be proposed for 2.4 branch (maybe even with the
>> changes adding socket activation), but for mod_journald, we would have to
>> backport "modular logging", which breaks the API/ABI and therefore I'm
>> afraid that won't happen in 2.4 branch :(.
>>
>>
> I have an old patch somewhere that doesn't break the API/ABI, and
> accommodates such differences as syslog being built-in in 2.4.x.  I didn't
> realize that anybody besides me actually cared.
>
> I'll try to find time to see how it fits in 2.4.x-HEAD.
>

I've simply attached it from its state one year ago, not having time to
play with it.  I don't think it is necessary to break the ABI.  syslog
support remains part of core logging instead of in a module.


>
>
>
>> Jan Kaluza
>>
>>
>>  As we have a lot of distributions already using systemd by default
>>> (CentOS/RHEL 7, Fedora, Arch Linux, CoreOS, openSUSE), and more of them
>>> are going to use systemd by default (Debian 8 (Jessie), Ubuntu), it
>>> requires manual patching of apache for the support of systemd/journald.
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

Mime
View raw message