Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB92A175E3 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29215 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 12:13:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29151 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 12:13:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29138 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2014 12:13:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:13:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.169] (HELO mail-ie0-f169.google.com) (209.85.223.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:13:19 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id tr6so2846510ieb.0 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 05:12:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ONqrt5WewLsIntVzG57n/umhSACObZwHyJMCgTD5i4g=; b=tUIjIYCJktOHy7BRHTbcUU8uvTZVlmWv7CdI/kD4f9tkOLK6KKtdtMwEqrUTHgd1l0 2+EWIReK+1GO4hACvmfVXV9gGOe1sojSlc60VbZ1sSB/jS5S/K7QSWHRDoB6Y2/ffpSh oCTz7h+uapIX8c+dIZKZHv7Aaq0li9WRpSR73/yh5fGHC4VDalofT7KplkEE1xDWyU5s c+q+dFbqNXY6O6m6llqWmqDTijcfWurd4p39jAGCIhv82Aqpm9HaLgmEBCpsk/iy2Pjj Ab4gzH9fUgIkhLxnFShmkREXAII8V6uVEE6W4M2Vu4+7+sHdCgNJgbs4WW4Kpz3+K5Ro JoqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.3.4 with SMTP id 4mr37853822igy.22.1414584778450; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 05:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.10.214 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 05:12:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:12:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Timeout 300 in default httpd.conf? From: Jeff Trawick To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c6cfe39703805068eaf00 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013c6cfe39703805068eaf00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > Is 300 good for anyone? The hard-coded default is 60 which seems awfully > high to me already. > I'm probably way off-base here, but since mod_reqtimeout is enabled by default now, is this 300 used mostly as a fallback for mod_proxy when ProxyTimeout isn't configured? Anyway, +1 for syncing the default config for Timeout with the internal default. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/ --089e013c6cfe39703805068eaf00 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> wrote:
Is 300 good for anyone?=C2=A0 The hard-coded default is 60= which seems awfully high to me already.=C2=A0

I'm probably way off-base here, but = since mod_reqtimeout is enabled by default now, is this 300 used mostly as = a fallback for mod_proxy when ProxyTimeout isn't configured?
=
Anyway, +1 for syncing the default config for Timeout with t= he internal default.

--
Born= in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

--089e013c6cfe39703805068eaf00--