httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
Subject AW: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Date Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:02:09 GMT


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jim Jagielski 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 19:58
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> 
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > Can we really backport this?
> >
> > We are increasing the size of proxy_worker_shared and changing offsets
> inside the struct.
> >
> 
> True, but if we bump the mmn, that should cover it.
> 
> I know of no-one other than httpd that uses that struct anyway
> and even though it's "public", no one else messes with
> it.

Then it shouldn't be in a public header, but in a private one.
Not sure how we can fix this now.

> 
> I am a BIG +1 for fixing this. At the very least, we

I agree that it would be a good fix. I am only worried about breaking our API promises.

> should add the backport which makes truncation of
> the name field a non-fatal error.

+1 to making it a non-fatal error.

Regards

Rüdiger


Mime
View raw message