httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Date Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:27:03 GMT
Agreed all the way around...

PS: I *think* we also did this before, when we needed
to bump up some *scoreboard* field sizes (to support
IPv6) and we still did it w/ a minor bump, iirc.

On Sep 4, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com>
wrote:

> 
> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Jim Jagielski 
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. September 2014 19:58
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1622429 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Can we really backport this?
>>> 
>>> We are increasing the size of proxy_worker_shared and changing offsets
>> inside the struct.
>>> 
>> 
>> True, but if we bump the mmn, that should cover it.
>> 
>> I know of no-one other than httpd that uses that struct anyway
>> and even though it's "public", no one else messes with
>> it.
> 
> Then it shouldn't be in a public header, but in a private one.
> Not sure how we can fix this now.
> 
>> 
>> I am a BIG +1 for fixing this. At the very least, we
> 
> I agree that it would be a good fix. I am only worried about breaking our API promises.
> 
>> should add the backport which makes truncation of
>> the name field a non-fatal error.
> 
> +1 to making it a non-fatal error.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Rüdiger


Mime
View raw message