httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: ./configure differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x
Date Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:29:33 GMT
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:55:17 +0200
Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote:

> *Please excuse my laziness* - because I am sure there is a way to get
> all modules activated in both 2.2.X and 2.4.X - only that they are
> slightly different - and I am sure you have documented it somewhere
> (and even mentioned it (that there are differences such as ...) in
> passing in previous replies)
> 
> For 2.2.X I use:
>  $ ./configure CFLAGS=-O2 --enable-layout=AIX
> --with-apr=/opt/bin/apr-1-config --with-apr-util=/opt/bin/apu-1-config
> --with-mpm=worker --enable-ssl --enable-mods-shared=all
> 
> But this does not seem to get the mod_proxy, and likely other, mods
> built.

We will not be changing the behavior of ./configure in 2.2 - users who
are picking up these critical fixes expect their previous ./config.nice
to do the same thing it did last time.

> For 2.4.X I use:
>   $ ./configure --enable-layout=AIX --with-apr=/opt/bin/apr-1-config
> --with-apr-util=/opt/bin/apu-1-config --enable-mpms-shared=all
> --enable-mods-shared=all --enable-load-all-modules --disable-lua
> 
> (Note: the --enable-load-all-modules is there for testing)
> 
> Apparently, my assumption that --enable-mods-shared=all would get all
> mods built and ready for LoadModule is incorrect.

True, there are legacy/testing mods that aren't built.  But the behavior
of most, all etc was significantly revised to better meet expectations
with the 2.4 release.  This version also should have no significant
changes to ./configure behavior, the next release (2.6, or 3.0) would
be the place for continued improvement.


Mime
View raw message