Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83CF910CE5 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7204 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2014 07:00:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 6765 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2014 07:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 6734 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2014 07:00:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:00:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul@querna.org designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.172] (HELO mail-ob0-f172.google.com) (209.85.214.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:00:11 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wo20so8530268obc.31 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:59:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=X4s+E+4lcViOPAcQLNWMJVkMJtuWliy8akpNSIn06rw=; b=g9j4vrgOS+fd1Urxgh5xqQ4v4iG3Jtj+4FRGSjGCmo8X1uCoFdUWGPC5xPTFTiUn9W xDi8DPv4QF9D94FqjcX+UsQsywySqqdkSerV7tLRc0RsjyspRBD55Sw/2zONLY40kQ/1 08ivhe/EWGiD3RXuOVi74gO1JRed6Fb0inmQnypoX+tfax6lAsnXKeSdlNYjwZt8gnHS U9TzFGO2yEQGoYWW8hyTraQHyh7j6nzQ5XaOiStHEu/+WG+ugFL6CH//KMmpwl7U8NHL D7zUIXypJuIjzxFDm6IZvB1Cq+KfRSbg/Jpx/Oz8nfX0M8mnTXn221EW2go6SB5R6+PP rKPA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmr8GrjO1ojUNOVvP8dxQvHje1DjRQgZFZGsotRU9e0/lQ/TV8Xmnjd/bCckfL0DnKX2Ql MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.118.1 with SMTP id ki1mr26262165oeb.10.1398754788253; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.124.2 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:59:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3F613044-D273-4973-AF88-65AAA88C6737@jaguNET.com> References: <3F613044-D273-4973-AF88-65AAA88C6737@jaguNET.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:59:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SSL and NPN From: Paul Querna To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tend to agree with the other comments, NPN by itself will be deprecated quickly, ALPN is the future. I'd vote for a series of back ports that include both NPN and ALPN together. On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Any reason to NOT include > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1332643 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1487772 > > in 2.4??