Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24D0C1006C for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44490 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2014 11:37:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44398 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2014 11:37:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44390 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2014 11:37:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:37:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.179] (HELO mail-vc0-f179.google.com) (209.85.220.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 11:37:30 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ij19so6987600vcb.10 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 04:37:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ebUYd0zFNT+qWsRSGDIRssLZowcFeXWfz6lzwO6mp8Y=; b=cXi+NTt5be7frkwkg1FsQdpLb/yZ3gyBI7QeId1Mfm1oD8abV6sZOfpaoUC6z/4iuZ 23ye7dDntzQ92T+YCZNuEjT0DCZ0fn27/ojLJhEi2hwUb42TeeSX5ymWIUUsIpzWQ0pR pSd06dIBUkUbKj0xaq1H5WUPCof3cqiAkqJFxgiNlHhj3F1qN7JAlHPUX7fduoPPRGhd oEUd9sZJh6EWt1vdO8prxDXTFmIOl4z/yl6UZPN/pADaqFMjcfhOBIpUOdcLrZnMjQes gVViw030ZsLvwhw8Ylecl8x2E8lNcxcH2QQypzGfmCDibBhEFKZRYfLjXtBYy6IPQeUL iyow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.55.133 with SMTP id vy5mr17670883vcb.17.1398598628081; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 04:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.8.197 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 04:37:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <36873d3bec9b677c38b9ae279dfcc102@bcs-frankfurt.de> References: <36873d3bec9b677c38b9ae279dfcc102@bcs-frankfurt.de> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:37:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IF/ELSE- section and mod_cache errors From: Eric Covener To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > > The other bug(?) I found was while using mod_cache together with a bogus > backend sending wrong timestamps in the headers leading to > > > [cache:info] [...] AH: cache: /myRequest?myQuery responded with an > uncacheable 304, retrying the request. Reason: contradiction: 304 Not > Modified, but Last-Modified modified, referer: https://my.host It didn't make it into the changelog, but this is fixed in a later 2.4.x: - * mod_cache: Stop invalidating cached responses when reval returns 304+Expires, - trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1518269 - 2.4.x patch: trunk works - +1 covener, jim, humbedooh