Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D865F10F26 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50292 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2014 13:32:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50237 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2014 13:32:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50227 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2014 13:32:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:32:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.232.224.70] (HELO mailout01.vodafone.com) (195.232.224.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:32:01 +0000 Received: from mailint01.vodafone.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout01.vodafone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1672E2C5B for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:31:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from VOEXC06W.internal.vodafone.com (voexc06w.dc-ratingen.de [145.230.101.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailint01.vodafone.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B24E2E2C3C for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:30:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from VOEXC10W.internal.vodafone.com (145.230.101.30) by VOEXC06W.internal.vodafone.com (145.230.101.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:30:50 +0100 Received: from VOEXM10W.internal.vodafone.com ([169.254.2.31]) by VOEXC10W.internal.vodafone.com ([145.230.101.30]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.002; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:30:50 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_Vodafone_Group?= To: "dev@httpd.apache.org" Subject: RE: PR 50335 missing patch? Thread-Topic: PR 50335 missing patch? Thread-Index: AQHPM7AaFNDO1cdR30+nD74xCX58iJrJAj8QgAAEOQCAABIxMA== Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:30:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AB1691BE05AE7F4992697F2A0835627AA6BEA222VOEXM10Winterna_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_AB1691BE05AE7F4992697F2A0835627AA6BEA222VOEXM10Winterna_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess the easiest one in this case is to create a new one. Regards R=FCdiger From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic.dev@gmail.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 14:25 To: httpd Subject: Re: PR 50335 missing patch? On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Pl=FCm, R=FCdiger, Vodafone Group > wrote: Go ahead and commit it. We can update the backport proposal for 2.2.x after= wards and propose it as a new one to 2.4.x. Commited to trunk and backport proposed to 2.4.x. For 2.2.x I'm not sure how to proceed since there is already 3 votes (inclu= ding mine) for the two first patches. Should I simply add the third patch in the same entry (which I guess would = invalidate the existing votes) or create a new entry like in 2.4.x? Regards R=FCdiger From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic.dev@gmail.com= ] Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 12:36 To: httpd Subject: PR 50335 missing patch? Hi, the patch proposed by R=FCdiger at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_= bug.cgi?id=3D50335#c30 has not been commited in trunk (nor backported...). Shouldn't it to fully address the issue? It seems that the error path is concerned too (since conn->scpool is still = destroyed before r->pool). Regards; Yann. --_000_AB1691BE05AE7F4992697F2A0835627AA6BEA222VOEXM10Winterna_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I guess the easiest one i= n this case is to create a new one.

 <= /p>

Regards=

 <= /p>

R=FCdiger

 

From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic.dev@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 14:25
To: httpd
Subject: Re: PR 50335 missing patch?

 

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Pl=FCm, R=FCdiger, = Vodafone Group <ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com> wrote:

Go ahead and commit it. We can update t= he backport proposal for 2.2.x afterwards and propose it as a new one to 2.4.x.

 

Commited to trunk and backp= ort proposed to 2.4.x.

For 2.2.x I'm not sure how to proceed since there is alrea= dy 3 votes (including mine) for the two first patches.

Should I simply add the third patch in the same entry (whi= ch I guess would invalidate the existing votes) or create a new entry like = in 2.4.x?


 

 

Regards

 

R=FCdiger

 

From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:y= lavic.dev@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 12:36
To: httpd
Subject: PR 50335 missing patch?

 

Hi,=

the patch proposed by R=FCdiger at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50335#c30 has not = been commited in trunk (nor backported...).

Sho= uldn't it to fully address the issue?

It seems that the error path is concerned too (since conn->scpool is = still destroyed before r->pool).

 

Regards;

Yann.

 

--_000_AB1691BE05AE7F4992697F2A0835627AA6BEA222VOEXM10Winterna_--