httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Looking to T&R 2.4.8 in Feb...
Date Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:33:01 GMT
"defect"?

We support UDS in ProxyPass. We don't in mod_rewrite.
Nor do we claim to. I don't think that's a "defect".

If later on UDS support is *also* added to mod_rewrite,
then good. But not having it there isn't, IMO, any
reason to not include it where we say it is, and
where we see it works.

On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:01:58 -0500
> Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Blaise Tarr <blaise.tarr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> So mod_rewrite is not recognizing the "unix:" prefix as being
>>> valid. I temporarily commented out the call of fully_qualify_uri(r)
>>> at mod_rewrite.c:4130, and now r->filename is set correctly:
>>> 
>> 
>> Yes, right now the UDS support is only valid directly via mod_proxy,
>> and the required hooks in mod_rewrite need to be done and
>> currently isn't supported.
>> 
>> I don't see that as a big issue, currently. ;)
> 
> No, it's currently not an issue, we haven't introduced that defect into
> a release branch.
> 
> Are you suggesting we hold off on the UDS support?  Or the 2.4.8 tag?
> Or that new defects are interesting challenges for users?
> 


Mime
View raw message