httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ryo takatsuki <>
Subject Re: UDS support for mod_rewrite
Date Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:13:52 GMT
>Your "hack" has the additional benefit is being
>a pooled connection and not a one-shot, and therefore
>will have better performance. But that isn't related
>to UDS at all.

Well, it is related to UDS in the sense of being my solution to make my
rewrites end up serving content obtained through a Unix socket :).

I initially had the old version of the UDS patch working with mod_rewrite
(using the default forward proxy worker) but it broke with newer versions
of the patch so I figured out that way of tricking mod_rewrite.

Regarding using a <Proxy> section to define the workers, I see the code
that should be defining it but I'm not able to make it work. I will
investigate it a little further, thanks!

Best regards,


2014/1/22 Daniel Ruggeri <>

> On 1/22/2014 5:48 AM, Juan José Medina Godoy wrote:
> > Do you think that approach is safe or is it likely to break at some
> > point? (relaying on the workers being located by url in that way,
> > without having to provide the socket in the rewrite)
> Seems safe... and quite clever, actually.
> --
> Daniel Ruggeri

 I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near Tannhauser Gate.
All those moments will be lost in time like tears in rain.
Time to die.

View raw message