httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Event and atomics, round II
Date Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:26:56 GMT
you are missing the point by focusing on the pedantics of
language policing. Whatever.

On Jan 9, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:06:46AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> sweet sassy molassy... what if the implementation defines that
>> behavior as spawning small gnomes? Then it's OK? That
>> would be defined and implementation-defined, but so what?
> 
> No, it needs to output an integer (without crashing or anything odd like
> that), but it is free to choose what integer, as long as is it consistent.
> I don't have the standard in front of me, so beware of errors, but it would
> AFAIK be allowed to e.g. convert all overflowing numbers to 12345.
> 
> Not that this would be very useful behavior, of course.
> 
> /* Steinar */
> -- 
> Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
> 


Mime
View raw message