httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Looking to T&R 2.4.8 in Feb...
Date Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:06:02 GMT
Thx! I'd like to have Bill look over these. :)

On Jan 9, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Mike Rumph <mike.rumph@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hello Jim,
> 
> I would like to make a suggestion that is off topic from the last couple of replies but
pertinent to a T&R of 2.4.8.
> 
> If anyone is interested in having mod_remoteip work correctly in Apache httpd 2.4.8,
> then the following bug reports and patches might be worth considering:
> 
> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54651
>    - This is my reworking to an attachment of a patch that was first presented over a
year ago.
>    - This is an essential patch for mod_remoteip to correctly process RemoteIPHeader
headers that contain a list of IP addresses.
> 
> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55972
>    - This is a fix to an obvious error that I recently discovered while studying mod_remoteip.c.
> 
> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55962
>    - This is my implementation of an idea suggested by William A. Rowe Jr.
>    - This one could bring a slight improvement in behavior to some unlikely use cases.
> 
> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55886
>    - This one is analysis on the question of what should appear in the client field on
the server-status page after mod_remoteip works its magic.
> 
> I am available to help with any further work that might be needed here.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike Rumph
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/9/2014 5:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> "defect"?
>> 
>> We support UDS in ProxyPass. We don't in mod_rewrite.
>> Nor do we claim to. I don't think that's a "defect".
>> 
>> If later on UDS support is *also* added to mod_rewrite,
>> then good. But not having it there isn't, IMO, any
>> reason to not include it where we say it is, and
>> where we see it works.
>> 
>> On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:01:58 -0500
>>> Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Blaise Tarr <blaise.tarr@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> So mod_rewrite is not recognizing the "unix:" prefix as being
>>>>> valid. I temporarily commented out the call of fully_qualify_uri(r)
>>>>> at mod_rewrite.c:4130, and now r->filename is set correctly:
>>>>> 
>>>> Yes, right now the UDS support is only valid directly via mod_proxy,
>>>> and the required hooks in mod_rewrite need to be done and
>>>> currently isn't supported.
>>>> 
>>>> I don't see that as a big issue, currently. ;)
>>> No, it's currently not an issue, we haven't introduced that defect into
>>> a release branch.
>>> 
>>> Are you suggesting we hold off on the UDS support?  Or the 2.4.8 tag?
>>> Or that new defects are interesting challenges for users?
>>> 
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message