Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 964F01010C for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63057 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2013 12:17:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 63047 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2013 12:17:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 63039 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2013 12:17:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:17:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [76.96.27.243] (HELO qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.243) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:17:18 +0000 Received: from omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0cGk1n0011ZMdJ4ADcGxLo; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:16:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.80.74]) by omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0cGv1n0021cCKD98ccGw6m; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:16:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: Do pools lead to bad programming? From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:16:54 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <246B53DE-ED00-49E4-BBE5-F3E9579FFFF4@jaguNET.com> References: <52A8FCB9.6010702@gmail.com> To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1386850617; bh=GJVn+ohD+jrGiifc/BoksnnMqpTrWmOYW9AOsxHgQC4=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=B59uqvTNtaIftoKNLilteIgRKViUJJ5Bt2N72pyQalYyn1tFV5InYV5dhwwytuvrx K1/kMc1apF+Ud1gr/5IczM/sOpn0SaQNfjak7sqt9unXhGx3NgYNneAJCWoEqaQsQy qxAHiU2mKLkd7X0Nh1553I6wen26qSIlV+BRflpLj0uoTHrjkG6iQZxxYPPHQFO9eM 3Veismr41xXS1Lgzy8oEdTGhr6Nkx5lR8BBJOLt4zhcsZeju3gylRhtp7ls81ZgbKb AndwojE+AwD6Rnec9Iv2mHCox03q+S9heUsH3H6y+K5KIdEYclbXU8NpyopdQzBS5S FfZ798euC/YGw== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 11, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: >=20 > Obviously allocating too early and then throwing away the results of = the allocation is a waste as you've pointed out, and should ideally be = smoked out and fixed. >=20 Agreed.