Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F3010AAD for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44728 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2013 19:53:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44679 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2013 19:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44671 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2013 19:53:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:53:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of DRuggeri@primary.net designates 216.87.38.203 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.87.38.203] (HELO s3.mail.rcig.net) (216.87.38.203) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:53:17 +0000 Received: from 96-35-201-208.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com ([96.35.201.208]:58623 helo=[192.168.0.2]) by s3.mail.rcig.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VirLy-0006Fo-Hz; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:52:56 -0600 Message-ID: <528BC13D.6020000@primary.net> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:51:25 -0600 From: Daniel Ruggeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Jagielski , dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: UDS Patch X-Priority: 4 (Low) References: <4BCDF1B3-F032-4EBA-816D-94555703B819@jaguNET.com> <52842703.6080506@primary.net> <84F4E273-EC68-4B5B-BD4F-55FEC65B1052@jaguNET.com> <528A65EB.60403@primary.net> <528A667F.9090004@primary.net> <528A6D03.9000203@primary.net> <528AB2BE.4010700@primary.net> <528B92E3.8060705@primary.net> <493EB860-6D08-4452-A39B-0B5520FC524B@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <493EB860-6D08-4452-A39B-0B5520FC524B@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: X-The email account used to send this email was: DRuggeri@primary.net X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "s3.mail.rcig.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Content preview: Yes, agreed. Not sure if I made it clear, but I did apply r1511313 for the tests I did today (but not the one from yesterday). Of the several emails sent, the following have been tested: 2.4.6 w the (several) originally proposed UDS patches applied in order 2.4.6 w proposed backport (the 2 chunks around the DNS changes fail to apply since they do not exist in 2.4.6) 2.4.6 w r1511313 + proposed backport + r1543174 [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 8.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Yes, agreed. Not sure if I made it clear, but I did apply r1511313 for the tests I did today (but not the one from yesterday). Of the several emails sent, the following have been tested: 2.4.6 w the (several) originally proposed UDS patches applied in order 2.4.6 w proposed backport (the 2 chunks around the DNS changes fail to apply since they do not exist in 2.4.6) 2.4.6 w r1511313 + proposed backport + r1543174 I DID double check that the machine wasn't requesting DNS lookups for the socket name or anything strange against the DNS server - but that was only for the test I ran today. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/19/2013 1:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > OK... the DNS lookup code seems to have changed between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7: > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1511313 > > So I'm wondering if there's something there.