httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: UDS Patch
Date Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:38:20 GMT
Any luck with generating the diff yet?

On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> The main thing is that it would be interesting to see
> the diffs between '2.4.6 w the (several) originally proposed UDS patches applied in order'
> and '2.4.6 w proposed backport'...
> 
> Those diffs should show just the differences between the UDS implementations...
> 
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <DRuggeri@primary.net> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, agreed. Not sure if I made it clear, but I did apply r1511313 for
>> the tests I did today (but not the one from yesterday).
>> 
>> Of the several emails sent, the following have been tested:
>> 2.4.6 w the (several) originally proposed UDS patches applied in order
>> 2.4.6 w proposed backport (the 2 chunks around the DNS changes fail to
>> apply since they do not exist in 2.4.6)
>> 2.4.6 w r1511313 + proposed backport + r1543174
>> 
>> I DID double check that the machine wasn't requesting DNS lookups for
>> the socket name or anything strange against the DNS server - but that
>> was only for the test I ran today.
>> 
>> --
>> Daniel Ruggeri
>> 
>> On 11/19/2013 1:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> OK... the DNS lookup code seems to have changed between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7:
>>> 
>>> 	https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1511313
>>> 
>>> So I'm wondering if there's something there.
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message