Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 413BCFB46 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 04:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99550 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2013 04:00:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99518 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2013 04:00:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99504 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2013 04:00:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 04:00:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [64.59.136.138] (HELO smtp-out-02.shaw.ca) (64.59.136.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 04:00:32 +0000 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=W0/jygPWOP4vNGB1giqMd6hViTlTWopR5z2gXdBWnF4= c=1 sm=1 a=kiG6hdqEmeoA:10 a=ikTxoJL1TlwA:10 a=2pqqzDx6IZcA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=DdNXKqgKDBkllHFzNm1XjA==:17 a=j6veevXV21-9SYnGlVwA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.246]) ([96.54.209.90]) by smtp-out-02.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 04 Oct 2013 22:00:10 -0600 Message-ID: <524F8EE3.4040108@pearsoncmg.com> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 21:00:35 -0700 From: Chris Darroch Organization: Pearson CMG/PLT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100319 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1357986 - /httpd/mod_fcgid/trunk/modules/fcgid/fcgid_bridge.c References: <20120705230110.6377A23889B3@eris.apache.org> <524CF970.7020103@pearsoncmg.com> <524CFB6E.5010008@pearsoncmg.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jeff Trawick wrote: > The app is out of spec either way. I think the trunk behavior is better. I'd agree on both counts (the latter IMHO, of course). For reference, here's a breakdown of 2.3.7 vs. trunk behaviour for Authorizers: Authorizer response 2.3.7 trunk =================== ===== ===== 200 proceed proceed 200 + rel Location 200 + munged out + err 401 200 + bad rel Location 404 + munged err + err 401 200 + abs Location 302 + Location 401 all other 401 401 I'll try to run some quick smoke tests on your 2.3.9 over the weekend; thanks again for pushing this along. Chris. -- GPG Key ID: 088335A9 GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9