Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: encountered temporary error during SPF
 processing of domain of jim@jagunet.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: event MPM (Was: Re: Planning for 2.4.7 in Oct)
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
In-Reply-To: <48EBAC05-D254-4F96-B464-29EC9B03560A@jaguNET.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:52:00 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6B658971-F686-46A9-AB20-54184ED6F94A@jaguNET.com>
References: <15FD89F3-7F99-43B2-95A3-1C8E7C412CEE@jaguNET.com>
 <46B24F91-90A2-4DEC-830F-0AFAE3B618C2@jaguNET.com>
 <5228FBAD.9070708@kippdata.de>
 <48EBAC05-D254-4F96-B464-29EC9B03560A@jaguNET.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

For the testing, we need:

    http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/httpd-2.4-skiplist.patch
    http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/httpd-2.4-podx.patch
    http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/httpd-2.4-event.patch

This includes all the performance/sync updates

Can we get infra to test that out somewhere?

On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de> wrote:
> 
>> On 05.09.2013 16:35, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> BTW, the main diff between event in trunk and 2.4 is
>>> the use of skiplist. My benchmarks show decreased latency
>>> and a performance boost of ~5% (on avg). Can anyone confirm?
>>> It would be nice to possibly get that in 2.4.7 as well.
>> 
>> I can offer to negotiate with infra to run 2.4 head plus event patches
>> for skiplist use on www.a.o EU if that helps collecting votes.
>> 
>> I did the httpd updates on www.a.o during the last months and in
>> previous years running non-released stuff there was a common practice,
>> so I hope infra will trust our opinion on whether the code should be
>> ready for prime time or not.
>> 
>> If we want to see the code running there, I would appreciate a patch
>> ready to apply to 2.4 event.c. I currently feel not in the position to
>> judge, whether running that code on www.a.o actually is a good idea or
>> not. Opinions?
> 
> 
> Great idea. I can create the 2.4 patch. (and add it to STATUS) ;)
>