Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-78365-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AD6710D01
	for <apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:25:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 83351 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2013 12:25:52 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83244 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2013 12:25:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83227 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2013 12:25:44 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:25:44 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates
 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.180] (HELO mail-lb0-f180.google.com)
 (209.85.217.180)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:25:39 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q8so1776256lbi.39
        for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=cL73VbOL3xZkTJ6WhzLJDKdoQauot3zo2gf/2vdLV8Y=;
        b=IYikw+uflEx2D22Nit8kwYIrpLra2rYv1eGKbVUF1frIr06RsjAzQofAlwL/IHoJ0Q
         CDjt5kGRyJlb3wGZEeRT9CwPrRKXX7jaY8mlDxjhHxTsYJkpnjUAL4VISYWIdma6nabX
         RzLlfBK/gC4dow5KUgdC1UNGnpWmKevBV9S5G0UUJYdrNioieK0x7Ba6CQN8Kg/W0g6a
         01+N5hbUeinA6xJ0lQipg/0i9pbNKcl79aFdgI4+I0+PmRi5SjR0u5x2wBRF7/BjVuHb
         YhE+sT8qX5XZQzcjU7kxX1hSegKnOVu7l1K4buUm0v61eC03w6crg8bOWhOmpq5+2eSu
         yQpQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.219.133 with SMTP id po5mr118574lbc.51.1377865518793;
 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.184.99 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:25:18 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAKUrXK51rawPuxtQKzvwy0k8g27P5QA_kF8mfW0voN7nuQ5kDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: will anyone build httpd/apr with cmake on Windows?
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List <dev@httpd.apache.org>,
 APR Developer List <dev@apr.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c32ed8cbd58c04e5295058
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a11c32ed8cbd58c04e5295058
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I will be throwing a bit more time at the cmake effort in the short term,
starting with comparing the installed artifacts with those of existing
Windows builds and adding missing pieces to the todo lists.  I might not do
much else proactively until my own use of the builds catches up and starts
to exceed what is implemented.

Please let me know if you

* are waiting for some certain feature (other than near perfection) before
you use it
* attempt to use it but are slowed down by tool requirements or bad
documentation or anything else
* attempt to use it but it fails so badly that you leave it in disgust with
no desire to report or try to fix anything
* try it and it works for you (what cmake backend, what other build
characteristics)
* etc.

Thanks!

-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

--001a11c32ed8cbd58c04e5295058
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I will be throwing a bit more time at the cmake effort in =
the short term, starting with comparing the installed artifacts with those =
of existing Windows builds and adding missing pieces to the todo lists. =A0=
I might not do much else proactively until my own use of the builds catches=
 up and starts to exceed what is implemented.<div>
<br></div><div>Please let me know if you</div><div><br></div><div>* are wai=
ting for some certain feature (other than near perfection) before you use i=
t</div><div>* attempt to use it but are slowed down by tool requirements or=
 bad documentation or anything else</div>
<div>* attempt to use it but it fails so badly that you leave it in disgust=
 with no desire to report or try to fix anything</div><div>* try it and it =
works for you (what cmake backend, what other build characteristics)</div>
<div>* etc.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div><div><br></div>-- <b=
r>Born in Roswell... married an alien...<br><a href=3D"http://emptyhammock.=
com/" target=3D"_blank">http://emptyhammock.com/</a><br>
</div></div>

--001a11c32ed8cbd58c04e5295058--