Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCAC310F96 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46743 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2013 16:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46364 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2013 16:24:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46342 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2013 16:24:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:24:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error during SPF processing of domain of jim@jagunet.com) Received: from [76.96.30.56] (HELO qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.56) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:23:56 +0000 Received: from omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by qmta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id EfD41m0031vN32cA6gPFpn; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:23:15 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.80.74]) by omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id EgPD1m00P1cCKD98igPEXA; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:23:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and util_fcgi From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:23:13 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7D9AEA9A-30E0-4C1B-B587-6318396DF16B@jaguNET.com> References: To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1376929395; bh=7JKvhc/1wUlzHSUv/LZbI00deEfN7R7X2lppUf8zEPE=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=EDKYiNQ+Lvc8oItY5al8yUvgLoT/C57KRGgONNosdvxnkBNQzASc0+SLazJHaaUm7 59gobhPEw0Ek131nnCjDY1DhitUx6CHIYKn+1dwJW5ZdMA6IOGYrtFotE0ks65GUCZ zlHz76CxyQEYloaXVtZTAdSTBRQNWCURXAdqS5grmSK2oKUJil4qNgEQXH6pzrEI9n 1C+4Q7OsLqJzj8u44sU2KQ6jT7pdr0IL0SHEMHXjdsBf6zStcI+3M1XtypTCbq/Yiq k1Jh7P56FpcnW5JoUSCCWnxg1HOrLVCxTfI/qxy3WNpKIloroHKOLIdGn2jw2akC6D 87U+J3fIUlIaQ== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm back from vaca and plan on folding in my UDS stuff this week... On Aug 13, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > I intend to update mod_proxy_fcgi to use util_fcgi "soon". IIUC Jim = and/or Daniel R. have been testing/fixing AF_UNIX stuff with = mod_proxy_fcgi and it might be disruptive to do that right now. (And = Jim is largely off-line this week so he probably won't comment on that.) >=20 > The FastCGI definitions/helpers used by mod_proxy_fcgi in 2.4.x are = private, so I don't believe there's any concern for mod_proxy_fcgi using = util_fcgi in that branch. >=20 > And hopefully mod_authnz_fcgi will follow before long, after = successfully testing with an authorizer that was previously used with = Zeus and relied on some authorizer protocol features that had not been = implemented by mod_fastcgi or mod_fcgid. > --=20 > Born in Roswell... married an alien... > http://emptyhammock.com/