Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A3FD10F01 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 14:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61177 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2013 14:56:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61139 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2013 14:56:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61131 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2013 14:56:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:56:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of isoma@jellybaby.net designates 80.68.88.207 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.68.88.207] (HELO nebula.c8h10n4o2.org.uk) (80.68.88.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:56:43 +0000 Received: from [81.2.91.97] (helo=consume.c8h10n4o2.org.uk) by nebula.c8h10n4o2.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwZL3-00024A-Qz for dev@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:56:21 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: [Bug 45023] DEFLATE preventing 304 NOT MODIFIED response From: Tim Bannister In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:56:21 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <560705A0-3CFC-4A65-9419-279258D02D33@jellybaby.net> References: To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 9 Jul 2013, at 15:49, Eric Covener wrote: > What to do in 2.4? Maybe still early enough to still change 2.4 = behavior? Roy Fielding links this to bug #39727=85 I still want to push for gzip Transfer-Encoding: in trunk (and maybe 2.4 = as well). It works, but my code is far too ugly to consider committing: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52860 Any help is definitely welcome. --=20 Tim Bannister =96 isoma@jellybaby.net