httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From MikeM <michaelm12-asfbugzi...@aquaorange.net>
Subject Re: [discussion] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]
Date Tue, 02 Jul 2013 14:20:45 GMT
Hi

Oh I see - I had not realised this. In that case, I agree that sticking 
with 0.9.x is the only sensible option at this point in time :)

Mike

On 02/07/2013 14:35, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:53 AM, MikeM 
> <michaelm12-asfbugzilla@aquaorange.net 
> <mailto:michaelm12-asfbugzilla@aquaorange.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Maybe the simple option is to do the final release with the
>     old/existing bundled APR, but put a foot note in the release notes
>     that the newer APR v1.4.8/1.5.2 has been confirmed to successfully
>     work with 2.0.65. This way it may give confidence to anyone who is
>     stuck on 2.0.x for some reason to use the newer APR/APR-util if
>     needs be.
>
>
> APR/APR-util 1.x won't work with httpd 2.0.x.  Someone continuing to 
> use 2.0.x will need to hand-pick or backport fixes from apr/apr-util 
> 0.9.x or later levels.  But then they'll have to backport fixes from 
> httpd too.  The line was drawn at slightly different places for httpd 
> vs. apr/apr-util, but the long term picture is the same: There is 
> effort to remain on httpd 2.0.x if you want to pick up any code fixes, 
> and the recommendation is clear.
>
>
>
>     Regards,
>     Mike
>
>
>     On 02/07/2013 13:06, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>
>         Hi Bill,
>         On 02.07.2013 01:47, wrowe@rowe-clan.net
>         <mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>
>             I am not at all concerned
>             whether APR 0.9 is
>             released again or not since folks had years to take that
>             up in our
>             discussions of
>             putting httpd 2.0 to bed, yet nobody so much as suggested
>             a release,
>             nevermind some
>             volunteer to act on it.
>
>         true; but I thought that most of us probably forgot about that
>         we bundle APR/APU with 2.0.x - like I did; the lack of APR/APU
>         fixes came only to my attention when I was on building the
>         2.0.65 binaries ...
>         but since nobody else expressed an oppinion about then thats
>         fine, and I shut up.
>
>             or if you have concurred with the group consensus to let
>             this story end
>             as of Jun 2013.
>
>         I have. Just did put the NetWare bins up; go ahead and release.
>
>         Gün.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> http://emptyhammock.com/


Mime
View raw message