Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E062CCC03 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85643 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2013 16:42:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 85552 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jun 2013 16:42:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 85537 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jun 2013 16:42:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:42:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:42:13 +0000 Received: from [172.17.100.8] apache@gknw.net [62.143.120.100] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:41:22 +0200 Message-ID: <51B20D28.70806@apache.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:41:12 +0200 From: Guenter Knauf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR References: <51B209C5.1040005@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: <51B209C5.1040005@kippdata.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote: > mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it t= o > be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to > allow incompatible changes. > > Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if > backports could be done quicker for some time until we think we have > approached stability. > > So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR. Please le= t > me know your objections if there are any. +1 - I prosed same already some days ago ... G=FCn.