Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96AE8CFFE for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68112 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2013 18:04:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68043 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2013 18:04:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68035 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2013 18:04:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:04:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.171.50] (HELO jupiter.hal-nine-zero-zero-zero.net) (217.160.171.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:04:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 2082 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2013 18:04:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (217.160.171.50) by jupiter.hal-nine-zero-zero-zero.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2013 18:04:31 -0000 From: =?utf-8?q?Andr=C3=A9_Malo?= Organization: TIMTOWTDI To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1491612 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:04:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20130610214107.C794223889EC@eris.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20130610214107.C794223889EC@eris.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201306112004.36298@news.perlig.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org * sf@apache.org wrote: > Author: sf > Date: Mon Jun 10 21:41:07 2013 > New Revision: 1491612 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1491612 > Log: > comment > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=149161 >2&r1=1491611&r2=1491612&view=diff > ========================================================================= >===== --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Jun 10 21:41:07 2013 > @@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155 > 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works > nd: why would you do that in a stable branch? > + sf: Because it is only annoying and serves no purpose anymore. If > you + want, we can make it a minor MMN bump for adding a "new" > API. +1: sf, covener > -1: nd Long discussions in STATUS are kinda tedious ;-) Well, I think, such changes are what trunk is for. Why not simply leave everything below as-is? Even more if it removes only an annoyance? Or is there a real technical reason I'm just not seeing right now? nd -- "Solides und umfangreiches Buch" -- aus einer Rezension