httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Covener <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1491612 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:20:04 GMT
> Of course. That's not the question (at least IMO). The question
> is that when a cosmetic change also results in a functional
> change (and we wouldn't be suggesting MMN bumps if it wasn't),
> that it becomes a change that should be proposed as a backport
> and not willy-nilly added. We have a process, and should
> discourage attempts to bypass it on a stable trunk.

This change followed the process. It currently sits in 2.4.x/STATUS.

View raw message