httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1491612 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:41:57 GMT
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
> > >        trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
> > >        2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
> > >        nd: why would you do that in a stable branch?
> > >
> > > +      sf: Because it is only annoying and serves no purpose
> > > anymore. If you +          want, we can make it a minor MMN bump
> > > for adding a "new" API. +1: sf, covener
> > >
> > >        -1: nd
> >
> > Long discussions in STATUS are kinda tedious ;-)
> >
> > Well, I think, such changes are what trunk is for. Why not simply
> > leave  everything below as-is? Even more if it removes only an
> > annoyance? Or is there a real technical reason I'm just not seeing
> > right now?

[...]
>
> Or, is there a real technical reason to keep it broken in 2.4?

Annoying rhetoric games aside - we went from "only annoying" to "broken". What 
is it now?

No other opinion on this?

nd

Mime
View raw message