httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1491612 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Date Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:04:36 GMT
* sf@apache.org wrote:

> Author: sf
> Date: Mon Jun 10 21:41:07 2013
> New Revision: 1491612
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1491612
> Log:
> comment
>
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=149161
>2&r1=1491611&r2=1491612&view=diff
> =========================================================================
>===== --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Jun 10 21:41:07 2013
> @@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>        trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
>        2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
>        nd: why would you do that in a stable branch?
> +      sf: Because it is only annoying and serves no purpose anymore. If
> you +          want, we can make it a minor MMN bump for adding a "new"
> API. +1: sf, covener
>        -1: nd

Long discussions in STATUS are kinda tedious ;-)

Well, I think, such changes are what trunk is for. Why not simply leave 
everything below as-is? Even more if it removes only an annoyance? Or is 
there a real technical reason I'm just not seeing right now?

nd
-- 
"Solides und umfangreiches Buch"
                                          -- aus einer Rezension

<http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>

Mime
View raw message