httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guenter Knauf <fua...@apache.org>
Subject Re: mod_ssl NPN API rejig (was Re: Intent to revert commit r1332643)
Date Wed, 29 May 2013 17:52:40 GMT
Hi Joe,
On 29.05.2013 18:06, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:37:14AM -0400, Matthew Steele wrote:
>> Oops, yes, RUN_ALL semantics are desired; the misleading API description is
>> my fault, sorry.  (I confess I never really understood why RUN_ALL hooks
>> accept both OK and DECLINED values, but then don't actually treat them any
>> differently.)  So probably we should update the doc comments.  I'd be happy
>> to draft new versions for those if that would be helpful, or not, as you
>> prefer.
>
> OK vs DECLINED has always confused me too ;)
>
> How does this look?  I've specified the behaviour for OK and DONE as
> return codes for both the callbacks; since the caller doesn't pay
> attention to errors I've left behaviour undefined for any other values.
>
> (Really attached this time)
thanks for looking into it!
I will test tomorrow; need a rest just now since was the whole day busy 
at customers; but perhaps Gregg beats me soon ...

Gün.



Mime
View raw message