Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17E6E92E3 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25365 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2013 18:13:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25305 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2013 18:13:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25297 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2013 18:13:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:13:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:13:13 +0000 Received: from [172.17.100.7] apache@gknw.net [62.143.120.100] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:12:42 +0100 Message-ID: <513A2A18.1060307@apache.org> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:12:40 +0100 From: Guenter Knauf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed Lua backport for 2.4 References: <513A128C.7070504@cord.dk> In-Reply-To: <513A128C.7070504@cord.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 08.03.2013 17:32, schrieb Daniel Gruno: > I've just proposed a rather large backport of all the Lua stuff we have= > in trunk, I hope you'll take a look at it. to me it seems to make more sense to just copy over the trunk version to = 2.4 branch ... G=FCn.