Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-76840-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4694E75B
	for <apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sun,  3 Feb 2013 23:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 50941 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2013 23:12:49 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50879 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2013 23:12:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50871 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2013 23:12:48 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:12:48 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-wg0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:12:39 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so4200783wgi.3
        for <dev@httpd.apache.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:12:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=PFmeWq+sl+Xo22T7J+pP3bBIBO5kzxJC4AtQTS5VMBk=;
        b=olRvP3CjusfF5X96UpdDxGtOHFkNtKJO4ravG2SNN+di5cYQqm2iKZg4CAZH3k5JBo
         +PyrCxKpDoWs88r+9Fj/WIK9jXPXEIsxpv8xcs65ksKRmnfFyv1/+ER9sjgTVvjYC+SE
         vuV8A7uHii48J9JGNyzOnefszYgtBh36A5F54s0/um573QcWW6ljYlGnXJB5ettLEXIE
         VC8TZTnv9Rqf8CEyS/3+QoGcQ3mkeAWmgbxxKGIxmUkl18mW7oM2mh0tfTKRsO8emqmc
         xiBU0j/PbF/fJDiRVRkeJn4PjEqDbI2+liho3U518Sw6Epa/orose1TUB31NEjSpDnOt
         z5UQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.84.168 with SMTP id a8mr7198062wiz.24.1359933138452;
 Sun, 03 Feb 2013 15:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.18.165 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.18.165 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:12:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C0D963C9-6017-4C80-BB0C-82358F4DE608@webthing.com>
References: <510D8293.8010103@gknw.net>
	<CABD8fLWs+94CmMkQ1NhkB3Gd2SV4dikVWrMNi4QobKdARvjN4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<C0D963C9-6017-4C80-BB0C-82358F4DE608@webthing.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:12:18 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CABD8fLVDfTPKk4NDGfCBjj_bWr03MkGZidcbLadCQqfFiYkA=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: trunk/mod_ssl and Windows
From: Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041827f2a2bffb04d4da1bb5
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--f46d041827f2a2bffb04d4da1bb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Gee, thanks for the education.

And I will continue to top-post. Deal with it.
On Feb 3, 2013 3:16 AM, "Nick Kew" <nick@webthing.com> wrote:

>
> On 3 Feb 2013, at 07:53, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
> Q: What is wrong with top-posting?
>
> > Whatever happened to Commit-Then-Review?!
>
> That's a judgement for the committer, suitable when the committer
> doesn't feel notice or discussion is required.  You may think Gregg
> is being over-diffident, but that's his right.  Nothing to lose by erring
> on the side of caution.
>
> > Are there any objections to this
>
> Seems unlikely.
>
> --
> Nick Kew
>

--f46d041827f2a2bffb04d4da1bb5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Gee, thanks for the education.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">And I will continue to top-post. Deal with it.</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Feb 3, 2013 3:16 AM, &quot;Nick Kew&quot; &lt=
;<a href=3D"mailto:nick@webthing.com">nick@webthing.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br t=
ype=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0=
 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On 3 Feb 2013, at 07:53, Greg Stein wrote:<br>
<br>
A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.<br>
Q: What is wrong with top-posting?<br>
<br>
&gt; Whatever happened to Commit-Then-Review?!<br>
<br>
That&#39;s a judgement for the committer, suitable when the committer<br>
doesn&#39;t feel notice or discussion is required. =A0You may think Gregg<b=
r>
is being over-diffident, but that&#39;s his right. =A0Nothing to lose by er=
ring<br>
on the side of caution.<br>
<br>
&gt; Are there any objections to this<br>
<br>
Seems unlikely.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Nick Kew<br>
</blockquote></div>

--f46d041827f2a2bffb04d4da1bb5--