Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:29:14 -0600
From: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Apache 2.4 adoption: Hackathon 11:00am Mon 2/25 Roundtable
Message-ID: <20130219232914.2b6eef1c@hub>
In-Reply-To: <20130205164443.395a5223@hub>
References: <20130205164443.395a5223@hub>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just a reminder that I'd like to take all this feedback and gather
further dev discussion at the hackathon this coming Monday to get
us closer to 2.4 (and perhaps, a more quickly-adopted 2.6/3.0).
Please join if you can get to Portland this coming Monday :)

TIA,

Bill


On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:44:43 -0600
"William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:

> I've found the following data summary very useful in terms of
> drill-down capability;
> 
> http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ws-apache/2.2/all
> http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ws-apache/2.4/all
> 
> while their breakdown/segmentation tabulations provide some
> interesting data such as;
> 
> http://w3techs.com/technologies/breakdown/ws-apache/operating_system
> 
> The very limited 'free' tabulation remaining from SecuritySpace 
> seems to back up this assessment;
> 
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/201301/servers.html
> 
> There seems to be a worthwhile discussion about the challenges
> presented by 2.4 which have adversely affected its adoption, 
> during the ApacheCon Hackathon Mon 2/25 in Portland.  I'd like
> to set aside time about 11am for that discussion for anyone who 
> wants to participate.
> 
> Once we take away some good information from that roundtable,
> it would be worthwhile to hold a BoF later in the week especially
> for end users who are looking at or challenged by adopting 2.4.
> 
>