Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:44:06 -0600
From: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 rewritebase
Message-ID: <20130218144406.69a6e111@hub>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALK=YjNt3OriKBfZHhS=0iipuWriPedsrCA4m82DifJzhL4bxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALK=YjMbkL1taXqSQBKkDPFRLu9W5UWcia8CDeAXXRb9YVENKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<51227A54.3000206@kippdata.de>
	<CALK=YjP0OK4Sv97D8Jn-g-Rgi+V03rFwnZv0dYpjuZyQ0G4ieQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130218142645.34eb63d6@hub>
	<CALK=YjNt3OriKBfZHhS=0iipuWriPedsrCA4m82DifJzhL4bxA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:36:17 -0500
Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Ok, so 2.2.23 had not suffered this regression yet?  If not, we
> > should just move ahead and then can consider any improved behavior
> > in 2.2.x. There are no changes to mod_rewrite in 2.2.x since 2.2.23
> > was tagged.
> 
> 2.2.23 has _a_ rewritebase regression reported a number of places. My
> recent fire drill was a regression in the fix for that original
> regression.
> 
> I'd like it in, but appreciate tough spot as RM -- your call.

What version was this introduced?  Is there a good reference PR?