httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Time [also] for 2.2.24
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:45:44 GMT
I really need to learn how to do the tests you guys do. iirc it is not as
simple as "make check" or "make test".

It will wait til 2.2.25 if it must, but I have some scripts to
autostart/stop httpd on AIX - must load a system to see if they are already
in 2.2.X. If not, who can I send the changes to?

Congratulations on the new release btw!

Michael

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de>wrote:

> On 16.02.2013 19:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:48:42 -0600
> > "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> I plan to tag between late Friday 15 Feb eve, and Saturday.  The
> >> remaining STATUS items only have a vote or two, or are contested
> >> and can't really be expected to hit this tag.  It might be a bit
> >> late to add more to STATUS for consideration, but if you were
> >> going to evalute any of these patches, now is your opportunity.
> >
> > Shifting this to Mon 18 Feb afternoon to be in sync with 2.4.4, so
> > feel free to work on late additions this weekend through STATUS.
>
> Info: I ran the test suite and got no unknown or unexpected failures
> (details see below).
>
> Tested configuration:
>
> - current 2.2.x HEAD with APR/APU 1.4.6/1.5.1
> - using shared modules "all"
> - tested for prefork, worker and event
> - each MPM tested with log level info and debug
> - platform Solaris 10 Sparc 32 Bit build
> - Libraries Expat 2.1.0 and PCRE 8.32 (or both bundled),
>   OpenSSL 1.0.1e with a few patches
> - Tool chain: gcc 4.7.2,
>   CFLAGS -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -mpcu=v9
>
> Known or expected failures:
>
> t/security/CVE-2005-3352.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  2
> It fails, because the test is already adjusted for a 2.4 backport that's
> waiting for the third vote in 2.2 STATUS (last item in the proposed
> backports list).
>
> t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2)
>   Failed tests:  2-3
> Perl problem, no regression.
>
> t/ssl/extlookup.t          (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  2
> t/ssl/require.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1)
>   Failed test:  9
> Both fail at least since 2.2.16, so no regression.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>

Mime
View raw message