Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40D2CEA51 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44772 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2013 18:42:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44723 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2013 18:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44715 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2013 18:42:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:42:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rainer.jung@kippdata.de designates 195.227.30.149 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.227.30.149] (HELO mailserver.kippdata.de) (195.227.30.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:42:23 +0000 Received: from [10.0.110.6] ([31.238.66.79]) by mailserver.kippdata.de (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id r05Ig0Cw015143 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 19:42:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E873F6.4040400@kippdata.de> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:41:58 +0100 From: Rainer Jung User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Balancer persist and inherit stuff in trunk References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 04.01.2013 19:48, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Have people had a chance to test, review and try the balancer > persist and inheritance stuff in trunk? I want to make > sure that we have some level of verification and agreement > there before I work on the backports for 2.4 ;) I didn't see any changes with respect to two of my original comments: The "Used" counters (number of shared mem slots) in balancer manager drops to "0" after restart/reboot´with persist on. This seems strange. Not that "Used" does *not* have anything to do with request counting. Second the "Elected" counter is persisted but e.g. the traffic counter's not. This seems somewhat inconsistent. I have no strong opinion whether to persist statistics or not, but we might want to behave consistently. I did not observe any functional changes after my Mail from Dec. 14, right? Regards, Rainer