From dev-return-76729-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Mon Jan 21 13:18:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7026D867 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62315 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2013 13:18:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62234 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2013 13:18:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62211 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2013 13:18:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:18:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FM_FRM_RN_L_BRACK,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matsu1229@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.53] (HELO mail-pb0-f53.google.com) (209.85.160.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:18:17 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id un1so2673597pbc.26 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 05:17:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=E6IzjlVQ/uI8lwikAhVzinOi7aM4ca4R6y7QWK1c6+M=; b=BjfuLwIkvHwqJygUy0nh9TV62Jqd6j17OlROnmF1wVvOyhNBZGaoDy75kddvS8nRrc h5JeMoYkPM3Hs0YFTZc/OjRTL/5ub9IX6Ob2dOtx8Gzj3ySOfRkerjf3uztnxGZkseWa 0yXXONCXvFtHgwhK5IUyfPVhH5GQawBTpjreprlau+U32qptH4jLI29TyKW7pjONFI7D Fn/i16XdxFlYfdhn3NY+39R9MyczfCCGOgDoAjPaoEx1GJm71t1FfCzogcDMGqx4yZEs R6pgAsiQ3PF5M+EILC4ED+6yJwMsnbZ3FPA2TOuQ+PNdELi+Y2z/XHv5tqCLAejsXK2X tZBw== X-Received: by 10.66.77.99 with SMTP id r3mr47229711paw.10.1358774276232; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 05:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.12.4] (KD124209040091.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp. [124.209.40.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wr4sm8683551pbc.72.2013.01.21.05.17.52 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 05:17:54 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: mod_mruby to provide an alternative to mod_lua From: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCPj5LXBsoQiAbJEJOPDJwGyhC?= In-Reply-To: <50FD3CAC.3070109@cord.dk> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:17:50 +0900 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2EE7A9D0-825C-496C-A0CB-3DDACB98450F@gmail.com> References: <50FBE3BB.1090506@cord.dk> <50FD128D.5080808@cord.dk> <19626A9B-C452-4998-88E3-56828048873C@gmail.com> <50FD3CAC.3070109@cord.dk> To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2013/01/21, at 22:03, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I tested benchmark of mod_mruby. >> >> test case are: > > My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even thread-aware)? > Most people will be using 2.4 with the event MPM, which is threaded, not > the prefork MPM. I have no problems doing concurrency on the prefork > MPM, it's with the worker/event MPM that things start to go wrong. > mod_mruby is very fast in the prefork MPM, but is not thread-safe. I try to implement thread-safe to mod_mruby. It's challenging!! Thank you for your reply. With regards, Ryosuke.