httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gavin McDonald" <ga...@16degrees.com.au>
Subject RE: [Vote] Overhaul modules.apache.org
Date Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:07:06 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Gruno [mailto:rumble@cord.dk]
> Sent: Saturday, 26 January 2013 8:54 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Overhaul modules.apache.org
> 
> On 01/25/2013 11:01 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> >
> > On 25 Jan 2013, at 13:21, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> >
> >> [  ] +1: I support this proposal
> >> [  ]  0: I don't care
> >> [  ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because...
> >
> > -1 as stated.  +1 in principle.
> >
> > IMHO it needs a tiny change.  Instead of creating a messy new DNS
> > entry for "modules-archive", it should live under a single
> > hostname: maybe modules.apache.org/archive/
> >
> > I can't access modules.humbedooh.com right now, but I'll take what's
> > there as of secondary importance: it's presumably intended more as
> > startingpoint than final product.
> >
> If people do not object to this, I believe we can accommodate your wish to
> put it under /archive instead without having to resort to a new vote.
> Anyone who's opposed to Nick's suggestion, please state so, or I will
assume
> that we can continue the voting with this addendum.

I don't mind either way, each has benefits/drawbacks. Each is easy to
implement.

Gav...

> 
> Apologies for the test site not being available at the time, it has been
fixed
> now.
> 
> And yes, it's a starting point. The whole point of this vote is to get
_started_
> on moving away from something that is utterly dysfunctional, and towards
> something that works and is simpler to manage. Once the voting is done,
> assuming no one starts throwing vetoes about, I will start a new thread,
> calling for ideas and suggestions on how to improve the new site, and as
I've
> stated earlier, I am looking for anyone who would like to contribute to
> maintaining and improving the site. As it stands, we have Rich, Gavin, Jan
> from Infrastructure (I hope/think) and myself doing moderation and
> reviewing the processes, but we'd like more to join.
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel.


Mime
View raw message