Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07961E43D for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83610 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2012 16:12:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83529 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2012 16:12:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83519 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2012 16:12:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:12:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com) (209.85.223.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:12:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c10so12789028ieb.25 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:11:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nDc+5dSyYD1ojogGLp2rQMaTU2HJDy9Wl+gBTqki6nc=; b=rOU2+h2//GqK78XHbBuBpDfzViXc6vxPI/aY7UYVHftaZj8xQT9Zgw1Y9UnluMs07N a95/ON6UnffxeDCOgrUwu3sGT69Pru1H5JwezvOsYEr8c1RebTv9uO0RmdPKTVS/yPW2 SuwhKOkNiv3yVSNcSVk7f/NjgpruAf/pyQdqHyNtiCmQakpbQGRfmv4us2vDLsWIBmH0 Y1hXVf4sp/lFWNlxIHLpazhstUiOez294+W7iGvWIR+lJwtMI8M2p8110p4kPtK4/Uy6 EAhjE4ng5tlrw6Ltl0vPMG+s10+skVi0y5htEsA75uU9RsE4adzJo2NmZJihzWqgZx// 3f0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.150.243 with SMTP id ul19mr16340779igb.5.1356711108070; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:11:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.122.76 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:11:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:11:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: mod_lbmethod_byrequests required to define a BalancerMember From: Eric Covener To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org When defining a balancer, mod_lbmethod_byrequests is always looked up explicitly and used as the initial LB method. I am curious how others feel about this: [ ] document that mod_lbmethod_byrequests needs to be loaded and improve the error [ ] make it work if ProxySet lbmethod=other occurs before BalancerMember [ ] make it work if ProxySet lbmethod=other occurs after BalancerMember [ ] refactor byrequests back into mod_proxy or mod_proxy_balancer so it's always available -- Eric Covener covener@gmail.com