httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gregg Smith <...@gknw.net>
Subject Re: Volunteers to drive an MSI build
Date Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:20:46 GMT
On 11/28/2012 8:10 AM, André Malo wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2012 17:02:30 Yehuda Katz wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, André Malo<nd@perlig.de>  wrote:
>>>> You know that, and I know that. Jst as our Windows users know
>>>> they have no use for source code.
>>> The discussion is moot. The ASF will not provide binary software.
>> Is that a new policy? ASF has provided (i.e. made available on
>> httpd.apache.org distribution mirrors) Windows binaries of HTTPD for (I can
>> say every release, since I did not check, but you get the idea).
>> The last one released was on 30-Jan-2012 of
>> httpd-2.2.22-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8t.msi (see
>> http://www.us.apache.org/dist//httpd/binaries/win32/).
>> There are *still* NetWare binaries being built.
> No, the ASF has not. And the policy (nor this discussion) is not new.
>
> Some individuals have provided those builds. Nobody has voted on them
> (because, how could one - I know, I wouldn't). They are not official relases.
Which to the average user that does not know this policy, can easily be 
construed as Official. I have not read every word here but I see nothing 
jumping out at me stating they are to not to considered official.
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/



Mime
View raw message