httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.0.65
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:36:30 GMT
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> Any others with time to look thru 2.0.65's STATUS file.
>> There are a handful of "showstoppers" that I'm thinking
>> about "deferring" and pushing ahead with the 2.0.65 release.
>
> I'll try to find a little time.
>
> My 2 cents (which I won't throw at any group of 3 that wants to put
> out a 2.0.nnn): I don't think we should "defer" anything.  Given the
> lack of time+interest, IMO the only 2.0.x after 2.0.65 should be to
> resolve unintended regressions introduced with 2.0.65, and bugs left
> unfixed in 2.0.65 can remain.  Then we wash our hands of it.

+1 and will try to look as well this week.

Mime
View raw message