httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: 2.0.65
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:53:37 GMT
Any others with time to look thru 2.0.65's STATUS file.
There are a handful of "showstoppers" that I'm thinking
about "deferring" and pushing ahead with the 2.0.65 release.

On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> I can't recall either, but doing so in conjunction with
> the 2.0.65 release likely makes sense.
> 
> On Sep 30, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <DRuggeri@primary.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 9/30/2012 10:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> There was an email on users@httpd that reminded me that 2.0.65 has
>>> been long left in a holding pattern.
>>> 
>>> Anyone opposed to me pushing for a 2.0.65 release by the
>>> end of this week?
>> 
>> No opposition, but this does remind me about the when-will-2.0-be-EOL
>> conversation. I think consensus was 1 year after the first 2.4 release
>> but I don't think I've seen such an announcement (I could have just
>> missed it, too).
>> 
>> -- 
>> Daniel Ruggeri
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message