httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: which apr-util is really "desired" for the 2.2.X branch
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:48:29 GMT
Nod - about where APR is going - dev@apr..., "new threads!"

this was about what to use with httpd today. And you answered that, if I
understood correctly - package both httpd 2.2.X and httpd 2.4.X with
apr-1.4.6 and apr-util-1.4.1 - because these "exist" officially.

Many thanks!

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> Am 19.09.2012 20:51, schrieb Michael Felt:
>
>  I have downloading an apr-1.5.X via SVN.
>>
> then you have the STATUS file which lists the details I post below inline
> ...
>
>
>  They are working on a release of apr-util-1.5.1. I may not have looked
>> correctly, but I do not see a release of apr-1.5.0.
>>
> yes, 1.5.0 was only tagged but not released - we moved forward due to some
> probs ...
>
>
>  I have built against these versions with no issues I have noticed for
>> httpd (make check for apr-util-1.5.1 is not perfect) - however, as a
>> packager I would "prefer" to be packaging against/with known release
>> numbers.
>>
> then you have to wait until the APR folks either release 1.5.1, or ditch
> it and again move on to 1.5.2 ...
>
>
>  I shall package the current apr-1.5.0, but just call it "beta", and
>> apr-util once it is released.
>>
> no; then you would pack a version which was never released! The recent
> offical version is 1.4.1, and this will stay until we release something
> newer ...
>
> see here for the current official releases:
> http://apr.apache.org/
>
> please direct further discussion about APR/APU/API to the apr devel list
> ;-)
>
> greets, G√ľnter.
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message