Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of benlaurie@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20120809084235.GA8565@redhat.com>
References: <20120706124110.B3B0423888EA@eris.apache.org>
	<4FF94526.4090103@velox.ch>
	<501E2A62.4090406@velox.ch>
	<502038D4.20401@kippdata.de>
	<50220079.7000400@velox.ch>
	<20120808160353.GA14521@redhat.com>
	<CAG5KPzxZ6_aS9xZkr0bUvsPbyxDiWpF-j3uO6gYDSUnMMHznVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120809084235.GA8565@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:25:43 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAG5KPzyExkC9JORqvNVk7R9TxsiUdYJ5UBRToFaT+p2nFK2HWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linking mod_ssl with a specific OpenSSL version
From: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:56:03AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > This all seems totally crazy to me.  Why are we adding complexity to the
>> > httpd build system so openssl devs can skip typing the " install" part
>> > of running "make install" when testing against modified versions of
>> > OpenSSL?  Joe
>>
>> IIRC, the issue is that it doesn't build correctly even if you do that
>> (to a non-standard location - and clearly installing to a standard
>> location is nuts).
>
> Doesn't build correctly... in what way?  I've done that loads of times
> building against OpenSSL from CVS.  All the code is still there so it
> better work or else we need to see bug reports.

In that it uses (parts of) the default install instead of the install
you specify. At least for some versions. I forget the details coz I
fixed it...

>
> Regards, Joe