Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A541DDEB7 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 22:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36558 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2012 22:24:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36479 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2012 22:24:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36470 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2012 22:24:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:24:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of DRuggeri@primary.net designates 216.87.38.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.87.38.220] (HELO mail3.primary.net) (216.87.38.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:24:38 +0000 Received: from home.simonrage.com ([216.114.77.126]:1764 helo=[192.168.0.2]) by mail3.primary.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1SoMNK-0003ql-L1 for dev@httpd.apache.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:24:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4FFB5A0C.7090701@primary.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:24:12 -0500 From: Daniel Ruggeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs References: <4FF9EEB4.4000006@cord.dk> <20120708221256.GG2743@toftum.dk> <4FFA8741.7020501@beamartyr.net> <4FFA9453.50600@cord.dk> In-Reply-To: <4FFA9453.50600@cord.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: X-The email account used to send this email was: DRuggeri@primary.net X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail3.primary.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 7/9/2012 3:20 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > I can, to some extent, understand Mads' reasons for voting -1, but I'd > also like some elaboration, so I don't get the wrong impression. > > Personally, my rationale for adopting it to 2.2 and 2.4 is that _people > will use it_ there, which is what we want. I have described this in the > wiki proposal a while ago, at > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DocsCommentSystem and I had really hoped > that all the pros and cons had been discussed by now. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7/9/2012 3:20 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > I can, to some extent, understand Mads' reasons for voting -1, but I'd > also like some elaboration, so I don't get the wrong impression. > > Personally, my rationale for adopting it to 2.2 and 2.4 is that _people > will use it_ there, which is what we want. I have described this in the > wiki proposal a while ago, at > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DocsCommentSystem and I had really hoped > that all the pros and cons had been discussed by now. Agreed [X] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because.... -- Daniel Ruggeri