Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E10B5D395 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78127 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2012 13:11:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 78040 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2012 13:11:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 78029 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2012 13:11:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:11:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 76.96.62.32 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com) Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:11:00 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZNZh1j0041swQuc53RAirl; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:10:42 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.80.74]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZRAY1j00a1cCKD93bRAaJp; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:10:35 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: Re: mpm-event-optimization From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:10:36 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2711D79B-D54C-4A10-8921-5DD419187B35@jaguNET.com> References: <3EEB0D29-984C-4478-AB70-5FCEC996479A@jaguNET.com> To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) On Jul 11, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> About 4 months ago we moved Paul's event optimization stuff >> to its own branch, and since then no work as been done on it >> at all... >>=20 >> I'd like for us to consider putting it back into trunk, so we >> can work out the bugs and issues and getting it up to snuff. >> This is in conjunction with my effort to reboot 'simple' (which >> I've been working on externally)... >=20 > But there have been quite a few bugfixes in trunk's mpm event since = the branch. We should get these into 2.4 first before we do radical = changes in trunk. There are also the patches from = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201203.mbox/%3C20120302= 2118.08839.sf%40sfritsch.de%3E but I didn't have enough cycles to finish = and commit those, yet. >=20 > Of course, this should not prevent anyone from committing improvements = to the mpm-event-optimization branch. >=20 To be clear, yes, the intent was to ensure that all patches from trunk got into 2.4 before we re-merge. My expectation is that the event optimizations will eventually find their way into 2.4.x (and not be part of 2.6.x) and so getting them back into trunk allows people to work them. Except for main branches, most side-branches just don't get worked. So my plan is: 1. We push all trunk event improvements into 2.4.x 2. We release 2.4.3 3. We re-merge the event optims back to trunk.=