httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Status of Windows-work for 2.4.x
Date Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:46:31 GMT
On 7/31/2012 3:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 7/18/2012 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Claudio Caldato (MS OPEN TECH)
>>> <claudioc@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>> I have a dev available now so we are ready to start.
>>>>
>>>> I have been out of the loop for a while so I’ll start by looking at
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476, please point me
to
>>>> any other relevant information. And please add ‘Windows’ to the subject
line
>>>> for any Windows related issue so it will be easier for me to know which
>>>> messages I have to read.
>>>>
>>>> I hope to have good news soon.
>>>
>>> Random question from the crowd...
>>>
>>> The WinNT MPM doesn't load the address of AcceptEx dynamically via
>>> WSAIoctl, though that is a documented requirement and shown in the
>>> AcceptEx sample I found.
>>>
>>> Is it possible that this results in flaky behavior depending on
>>> third-party software installed?
>>
>> That is entirely possible but unlikely.  The present flakey behavior is not
>> surrounding AcceptEx(), it works for the vast majority of configurations
>> until incomplete socket providers are added.  But I'd be happy to see a patch
>> to resolve AcceptEx dynamically.
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1363312

Looks great!  Thanks for the patch :)




Mime
View raw message