httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Gruno <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1339313 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/rewrite: access.html.en advanced.html.en avoid.html.en flags.html.en htaccess.html.en index.html.en intro.html.en proxy.html.en remapping.html.en rewritemap.html.en tech.html.en vhosts.html.en
Date Thu, 17 May 2012 09:13:07 GMT
On 05/17/2012 07:53 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> -1, please revert. Before starting to track users on
> with GA, I would expect two things to happen: a discussion/vote on
> httpd-dev (as was the case for the commentary system) and - provided
> that the vote passes - having a privacy policy for the HTTP server
> project in place [1]. Lack of the latter is a blocker even for tiny
> changes to right now, which is the
> primary reason for my veto. 
My intentions were indeed to have a vote about this, and the small
portion of tracking that I rolled out was never intended as more than a
small one-day test to see if we could get it set up and working, since
there seemed, at the time, to be no objections on doing it. I'm sorry if
this seemed rash, and I have reverted it back to what is was before. One
has to learn how to walk the line between voting on issues or just doing
it, and I completely acknowledge your reasons for the -1 - lesson learned :)

Since I still feel that this is something we could benefit from, I will
report my message to docs@ below, so the dev@ people can have a look as

I've been wondering for some time now, how we can improve the site to
give the users a better experience and a faster flow from question to
answer. In that search, the question of doing a proper facts-based
analysis keeps popping up.

What I would essentially like is to be able to look at the flow that
happens from when a users has a problem till he/she finds a solution
in our documentation (or on our IRC channel or mailing list). We
should, as documentation writers, have some idea of whether our
efforts are fruitful or not, and whether we can improve pages A, B or
C to make it easier for users to search for an answer and find it, but
without some form of log files or analytics tool, this becomes quite
hard, if not impossible.

I would therefore like to propose that we implement some form of
anonymous analysis snippet on our documentation, so that we can figure
out some facts:

- What are users generally searching for when they wind up on our pages?
- Which flow of content occurs when a user browses through the docs,
looking for answers to problem A, B or C? Do they go through the guide
as we intended for them to do, or do they pick a different path, and
if so, why?
- What are people generally reading about? Which pages are the most
popular, and which are almost never touched (and does this reflect our
own ideas of which pages are the most useful in various scenarios)?

I believe that if we had these facts sorted out, we could more easily
work towards improving our documentation and help people reach the
answers to their questions faster.

I'm looking forward to suggestions, comments and critique as always 
Also, if people know of some good ways to accomplish this,
specifically which tools we could use, I'd appreciate some insight
into that as well.


With regards,

View raw message