Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 189C89286 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95373 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2012 23:26:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95296 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2012 23:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 95288 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2012 23:26:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:26:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:25:53 +0000 Received: from [172.17.100.7] apache@gknw.net [95.222.180.83] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:25:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4F9DCDD5.7070605@apache.org> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:25:09 +0200 From: Guenter Knauf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: are the *.exp files still used by any platform? References: <4F9DA7E8.8030403@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 29.04.2012 22:59, schrieb Eric Covener: > AFAICT AIX/libtool uses export files generated during the build, but > does not use the checked in ones. well, thats the point: if those in svn were used then a lot would be=20 missing since all newer modules dont have them ... G=FCn.