Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FE279CB7 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46226 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 21:49:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46174 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 21:49:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 46166 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2012 21:49:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:49:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.75] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:49:49 +0000 Received: from [172.17.100.7] apache@gknw.net [88.152.170.69] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:49:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4F6263BD.6000804@apache.org> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:48:45 +0100 From: Guenter Knauf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Cannot start httpd v2.4.1 with mpm_build on AIX References: <4F56B33A.3040102@apache.org> <4F623925.9040201@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jeff, Am 15.03.2012 22:32, schrieb Jeff Trawick: > The short form is that I'm going to revert the trunk commit(s) today, > and when there's a good solution I'll put them back with the fix and > propose them for backport to 2.4.x. if we are fine with few '#ifndef NETWARE' in mpm_common.h then I commit=20 this - I have it already here for testing ... and dont get my ping a rant - I only wanted to know how to proceed with=20 this issue. G=FCn.