Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4F56A7B4.4050800@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:11:32 -0600
From: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
CC: =?UTF-8?B?SWdvciBHYWxpxIc=?= <i.galic@brainsware.org>
Subject: Re: removal of mod_noloris?
References: <2608d4ba-eb92-48dd-a0ca-07c7096b47f2@iris>
In-Reply-To: <2608d4ba-eb92-48dd-a0ca-07c7096b47f2@iris>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 3/6/2012 5:18 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 06 Mar 2012, at 4:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm fine with that.
>>>>
>>>> What about the folks who voted to keep it last time the subject
>>>> arose?
>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/users/383407
>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/383405
>>>
>>> Do we just need to offer Dirk an alternate URL for downloading it?
>>
>> How about some kind of "attic" for old modules or old code? Something
>> like this:
>>
>> trunk
>> tags
>> branches
>> attic
> 
> Can we put 1.3 there too ;)

:)

If there will be no further changes, svn rm is our friend.  Simply publish
a pointer to repos@rev if you want simple access to the non-editable resource.

The only reason to leave a file active in svn is for purpose of collaboration
and modification.  Nick stated mod_noloris has been absorbed by a replacement
effort and offers nothing further for the project.