httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Felt <>
Subject Re: A push for 2.4.2
Date Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:18:52 GMT
I have been trying to build trunk from "trunk" versions of apr and
apr-util. buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or
apr-UTIL). In any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but
UNIX does.

To test what you are testing - should I use apr and apr-util trunks, or is
it better "in all thinks" - i.e. including httpd-trunk builds to use the
released versions of apr, or their trunk versions. Reading the lists I see
many of you are involved in both projects. I just want to be in sync with
the ways you test for new releases.


On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Graham Leggett <> wrote:

> On 25 Mar 2012, at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
> > for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
> > the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
> >
> > Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
> +1.
> I've just T&R'ed apr-util v1.4.2, containing some compile time fixes for
> static builds. In theory, given no drama it should be ready for April 2nd.
> Regards,
> Graham
> --

View raw message